State AG Seeks to Restore Gun Ban for Under 21s

State AG Seeks to Restore Gun Ban for Under 21s

Attention all freedom-loving patriots! While we’re busy defending our constitutional rights, it seems some folks in Minnesota are trying to pull a fast one on our young adults. Grab your coffee and settle in, because we’re about to dive into a constitutional debate that’s hotter than a Fourth of July barbecue. Minnesota’s Attorney General is pushing to ban guns for 18- to 20-year-olds, and we’ve got the scoop on why this matters to every red-blooded American who cherishes their Second Amendment rights.

The Battle in the Courts

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has petitioned the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals to reinstate a state law that prohibits 18- to 20-year-olds from obtaining permits to carry guns in public. This move comes after a three-judge panel of the same court ruled that Minnesota’s law is unconstitutional, siding with the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus.

The panel’s decision aligns with the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the Bruen case, which expanded gun rights. However, Ellison argues that the panel didn’t adequately consider a more recent Supreme Court decision in United States v. Rahimi, which upheld a federal law protecting domestic violence victims.

The Constitutional Argument

Minnesota contends that 18- to 20-year-olds are not competent to make responsible gun-related decisions and pose a danger. However, the appeals court ruled that the Second Amendment’s text does not specify an age limit, implying that young adults also deserve its protections.

This debate raises important questions about the extent of Second Amendment protections and whether age-based restrictions on gun rights are constitutional.

The Current Situation

As it stands, the law remains active due to a lower court ruling that halted its overturning during the appeal process. U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez previously struck down the Minnesota law but granted a stay for appeal resolution.

Ellison’s petition seeks a full-court (en banc) review, noting that similar laws exist in other states. This move could have far-reaching implications for gun rights across the country, especially for young adults.

What’s at Stake

Minnesota’s carry permit law requires firearms training and a background check by local sheriffs. Proponents argue that these requirements ensure responsible gun ownership, while opponents see them as unnecessary restrictions on constitutional rights.

The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how similar laws are treated in other states, potentially affecting the rights of millions of young Americans. It also highlights the ongoing tension between public safety concerns and individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

As this debate unfolds, it’s crucial for all Americans to stay informed and engaged in the conversation about our fundamental rights and the role of government in regulating them. The Constitution is the bedrock of our nation, and any attempt to chip away at its protections deserves our utmost attention and scrutiny.

Sources:

  1. Minnesota attorney general seeks to restore state ban on people under 21 carrying guns
  2. Minnesota Attorney General Seeks to Restore State Ban
  3. Minnesota challenges decision overturning minimum age of 21 to carry guns
  4. Minnesota’s ban on gun carry permits for young adults is unconstitutional
  5. Attorney General asks for review of decision allowing under 21-year old permit to carry firearms

ONE OF THE BIGGEST RULINGS TO HAPPEN THIS YEAR.

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS BAN ON GUNS FOR THOSE WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDERS

Minnesota attorney general seeks to restore state ban:

AG speaks out:

FPC Defeats Minnesota’s Age-Based Carry Ban

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR